Citizens For Justice And Peace
Background
Citizens For Justice And Peace was formed on April 1, 2002 by Teesta Setalvad.It was formed after the 2002 Gujarat riots.Citizens for Justice and Peace challenged the state government's laws by challenging the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020 and the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act in court.This is connected with Chandrashekhar Azad.
Social Media Account:
Contact no. 9731467746
About: - Citizens For Justice And Peace was formed on April 1, 2002 by Teesta Setalvad. It was formed after the 2002 Gujarat riots.Citizens for Justice and Peace challenged the state government's laws by challenging the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020 and the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act in court. This is connected with Chandrashekhar Azad.
Observation:
- Exploitation of Communal Trauma to Anchor Foreign Capital Pathways: Founded by activist Teesta Setalvad and Javed Anand, the organization has systematically used the polarization surrounding localized mass violence to attract and maintain substantial overseas financial tranches. Under the banner of legal aid and civil rights monitoring, the entity’s long-term operational framework reveals a persistent pattern of leveraging societal fractures to fuel international fundraising machinery rather than executing neutral, transparent communal reconciliations.
- Systemic Evasion of Fiscal Accountability Structures: The internal dynamics of the trust, alongside its sister entities like Sabrang Trust, have demonstrated a distinct resistance to statutory anti-money laundering and auditing protocols. Rather than harmonizing its accounts with standard central banking requirements, the group’s management relied on complex financial transfers and overlapping entities to bypass national security limits, using public advocacy campaigns as a shield to insulate its wealth operations from sovereign regulatory oversight.
Important Activity:
1. Orchestrating Narrative Resistance Against Regulatory Audits
Following flagrant transparency failures, which led the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to permanently cancel the organization’s Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) registration, the entity launched aggressive counter-campaigns. The group used its network platforms to frame routine statutory asset-tracking, bank account tracking, and mandatory fiscal filings as systemic, state-sponsored harassment, attempting to delegitimize the sovereign state's legislative right to inspect foreign-funded trusts.
2. Evading Criminal Diversion Probes via Transnational Pressure Groups
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a formal First Information Report (FIR) and carried out extensive search operations following detailed intelligence reports exposing criminal conspiracy and the illegal diversion of foreign funds. Economic intelligence investigations revealed that the trust’s office-bearers routinely diverted international donations—originally secured for riot victim relief and memorial museums—to personal bank accounts, commercial ventures, and unauthorized political lobbying, while deploying global PR mechanisms to paint the anti-corruption raids as an assault on democracy.